You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Holocene landscape intervention and plant food production strategies in island and mainland Southeast Asia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2013.12.011 |
Authors |
C.O. Hunt, R.J. Rabett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Philippines | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 36 | 22% |
Unknown | 22 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 32 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 25 | 16% |
Arts and Humanities | 23 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 14% |
Unknown | 29 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#362,338
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#95
of 2,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,664
of 273,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#2
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.