↓ Skip to main content

Benchmarking Organic Micropollutants in Wastewater, Recycled Water and Drinking Water with In Vitro Bioassays

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
365 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benchmarking Organic Micropollutants in Wastewater, Recycled Water and Drinking Water with In Vitro Bioassays
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, December 2013
DOI 10.1021/es403899t
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beate I. Escher, Mayumi Allinson, Rolf Altenburger, Peter A. Bain, Patrick Balaguer, Wibke Busch, Jordan Crago, Nancy D. Denslow, Elke Dopp, Klara Hilscherova, Andrew R. Humpage, Anu Kumar, Marina Grimaldi, B. Sumith Jayasinghe, Barbora Jarosova, Ai Jia, Sergei Makarov, Keith A. Maruya, Alex Medvedev, Alvine C. Mehinto, Jamie E. Mendez, Anita Poulsen, Erik Prochazka, Jessica Richard, Andrea Schifferli, Daniel Schlenk, Stefan Scholz, Fujio Shiraishi, Shane Snyder, Guanyong Su, Janet Y. M. Tang, Bart van der Burg, Sander C. van der Linden, Inge Werner, Sandy D. Westerheide, Chris K. C. Wong, Min Yang, Bonnie H. Y. Yeung, Xiaowei Zhang, Frederic D. L. Leusch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 416 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 21%
Student > Master 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 93 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 141 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 12%
Engineering 35 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 6%
Chemistry 19 4%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 126 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,525,084
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#8,827
of 21,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,912
of 323,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#124
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.