↓ Skip to main content

The fidelity of stochastic single-molecule super-resolution reconstructions critically depends upon robust background estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The fidelity of stochastic single-molecule super-resolution reconstructions critically depends upon robust background estimation
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep03854
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eelco Hoogendoorn, Kevin C. Crosby, Daniela Leyton-Puig, Ronald M. P. Breedijk, Kees Jalink, Theodorus W. J. Gadella, Marten Postma

Abstract

The quality of super resolution images obtained by stochastic single-molecule microscopy critically depends on image analysis algorithms. We find that the choice of background estimator is often the most important determinant of reconstruction quality. A variety of techniques have found use, but many have a very narrow range of applicability depending upon the characteristics of the raw data. Importantly, we observe that when using otherwise accurate algorithms, unaccounted background components can give rise to biases on scales defeating the purpose of super-resolution microscopy. We find that a temporal median filter in particular provides a simple yet effective solution to the problem of background estimation, which we demonstrate over a range of imaging modalities and different reconstruction methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 5 3%
Germany 3 2%
France 3 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 133 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 24%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 26%
Physics and Astronomy 31 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Engineering 12 8%
Chemistry 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,821,670
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#37,519
of 141,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,947
of 321,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#191
of 723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.