↓ Skip to main content

Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Neurodynamics, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures
Published in
Cognitive Neurodynamics, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11571-013-9267-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. D. Bonita, L. C. C. Ambolode, B. M. Rosenberg, C. J. Cellucci, T. A. A. Watanabe, P. E. Rapp, A. M. Albano

Abstract

Correlations between ten-channel EEGs obtained from thirteen healthy adult participants were investigated. Signals were obtained in two behavioral states: eyes open no task and eyes closed no task. Four time domain measures were compared: Pearson product moment correlation, Spearman rank order correlation, Kendall rank order correlation and mutual information. The psychophysiological utility of each measure was assessed by determining its ability to discriminate between conditions. The sensitivity to epoch length was assessed by repeating calculations with 1, 2, 3, …, 8 s epochs. The robustness to noise was assessed by performing calculations with noise corrupted versions of the original signals (SNRs of 0, 5 and 10 dB). Three results were obtained in these calculations. First, mutual information effectively discriminated between states with less data. Pearson, Spearman and Kendall failed to discriminate between states with a 1 s epoch, while a statistically significant separation was obtained with mutual information. Second, at all epoch durations tested, the measure of between-state discrimination was greater for mutual information. Third, discrimination based on mutual information was more robust to noise. The limitations of this study are discussed. Further comparisons should be made with frequency domain measures, with measures constructed with embedded data and with the maximal information coefficient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Student > Master 26 17%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor 9 6%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 29%
Neuroscience 21 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Computer Science 11 7%
Psychology 11 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,361,534
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#195
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,536
of 196,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them