↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for chronic heart failure in the elderly: current practice and problems

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment for chronic heart failure in the elderly: current practice and problems
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10741-012-9363-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pasquale Abete, Gianluca Testa, David Della-Morte, Gaetano Gargiulo, Gianluigi Galizia, Domenico de Santis, Antonio Magliocca, Claudia Basile, Francesco Cacciatore

Abstract

Treatment for chronic heart failure (CHF) is strongly focused on evidence-based medicine. However, large trials are often far away from the "real world" of geriatric patients and their messages are poorly transferable to the clinical management of CHF elderly patients. Precipitating factors and especially non-cardiac comorbidity may decompensate CHF in the elderly. More importantly, drugs of first choice, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and β-blockers, are still underused and effective drugs on diastolic dysfunction are not available. Poor adherence to therapy, especially for cognitive and depression disorders, worsens the management. Electrical therapy is indicated, but attention to the older age groups with reduced life expectancy has to be paid. Physical exercise, stem cells, gene delivery, and new devices are encouraging, but definitive results are still not available. Palliative care plays a key role to the end-stage of the disease. Follow-up of CHF elderly patient is very important but tele-medicine is the future. Finally, self-care management, caregiver training, and multidimensional team represent the critical point of the treatment for CHF elderly patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 330 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 13%
Researcher 35 11%
Student > Master 35 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 97 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Psychology 16 5%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 107 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,664,550
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#63
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,674
of 183,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them