You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Neurophysiology, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark G. Stokes, Christopher D. Chambers, Ian C. Gould, Therese English, Elizabeth McNaught, Odette McDonald, Jason B. Mattingley |
| Abstract |
To examine the relationship between coil-cortex distance and effective cortical stimulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the left and right motor cortex. We also compare the effect of coil-cortex distance using 50 and 70 mm figure-eight stimulating coils. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 25% |
| Researcher | 47 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 43 | 23% |
| Psychology | 41 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neurophysiology
#3,982
of 5,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,698
of 83,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neurophysiology
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.