You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Slow Recovery from Local Disturbances as an Indicator for Loss of Ecosystem Resilience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-017-0154-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid A. van de Leemput, Vasilis Dakos, Marten Scheffer, Egbert H. van Nes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
| Researcher | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 71 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,814,222
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#417
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,933
of 335,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.