You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why Social Science is Biological Science
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal for General Philosophy of Science, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10838-017-9365-0 |
Authors |
Alex Rosenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 3 | 12% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Croatia | 1 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | 4% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
Scientists | 7 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 29% |
Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 24% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,239,520
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#5
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,875
of 331,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them