↓ Skip to main content

Variants in the fetal genome near FLT1 are associated with risk of preeclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variants in the fetal genome near FLT1 are associated with risk of preeclampsia
Published in
Nature Genetics, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/ng.3895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralph McGinnis, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir, Nicholas O Williams, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Scott Shooter, Sigrun Hjartardottir, Suzannah Bumpstead, Lilja Stefansdottir, Lucy Hildyard, Jon K Sigurdsson, John P Kemp, Gabriela B Silva, Liv Cecilie V Thomsen, Tiina Jääskeläinen, Eero Kajantie, Sally Chappell, Noor Kalsheker, Ashley Moffett, Susan Hiby, Wai Kwong Lee, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Nigel A B Simpson, Vivien A Dolby, Eleonora Staines-Urias, Stephanie M Engel, Anita Haugan, Lill Trogstad, Gulnara Svyatova, Nodira Zakhidova, Dilbar Najmutdinova, Anna F Dominiczak, Håkon K Gjessing, Juan P Casas, Frank Dudbridge, James J Walker, Fiona Broughton Pipkin, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Reynir T Geirsson, Debbie A Lawlor, Ann-Charlotte Iversen, Per Magnus, Hannele Laivuori, Kari Stefansson, Linda Morgan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 282 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Master 28 10%
Other 15 5%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 96 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 107 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#185,713
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#278
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,916
of 333,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#6
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.