Title |
Optimization of the Racking Hitch Knot: How Many Half Hitches and Which Suture Material Provide the Greatest Security?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3478-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James D. Kelly, Suketu Vaishnav, Bradley M. Saunders, Mark A. Schrumpf |
Abstract |
Reliable methods of fixation of soft tissue and bone are of utmost importance in reconstructive shoulder surgery and in many orthopaedic applications. Current methods of securing lesser tuberosity osteotomies performed during shoulder arthroplasty and tuberosity fixation performed during repair of proximal humeral fractures often rely on alternating half hitches or surgeon's knots regardless of the suture configuration used passing through the tissue (eg, Mason-Allen, Krackow). The racking hitch knot in contrast to half hitches allows sequential tightening, even under tension, with minimal risk of knot slippage or premature locking. These knot characteristics allow the surgeon to stepwise improve their reduction before committing and locking a construct, preventing hanging knots or under-tensioned repairs. However, little data exist to support the use the racking hitch knot to guide decision making regarding how to back up the knot or to explain the effect of suture material on security and strength. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 51% |
Engineering | 5 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |