↓ Skip to main content

Use of CTX-I and PINP as bone turnover markers: National Bone Health Alliance recommendations to standardize sample handling and patient preparation to reduce pre-analytical variability

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of CTX-I and PINP as bone turnover markers: National Bone Health Alliance recommendations to standardize sample handling and patient preparation to reduce pre-analytical variability
Published in
Osteoporosis International, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00198-017-4082-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Szulc, K. Naylor, N. R. Hoyle, R. Eastell, E. T. Leary, for the National Bone Health Alliance Bone Turnover Marker Project

Abstract

N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen are the reference standards for bone turnover markers for monitoring osteoporosis treatment. We provide recommendations for standardized sample handling and encompassing aspects of preanalytical variability to improve the reproductibility of their measurements, their reliability, and clinical interpretation. The International Osteoporosis Foundation and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry bone turnover marker standards working group have identified N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) in the blood to be the international reference standards for bone turnover markers for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment. The National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) Bone Turnover Marker Project team set up a writing group to describe sources of pre-analytical variability that may influence the measurements of bone markers, and in particular PINP and CTX-I. Published data has been reviewed to provide a basis for recommendations for standardized sample handling, taking into account pre-analytical variability in order to decrease the variability for measurements of CTX and PINP so as to improve their reliability and interpretation. The International Osteoporosis Foundation and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Bone Turnover Marker Standards Working Group have identified N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) in the blood to be the international reference standards for bone turnover markers for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment. The National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) Bone Turnover Marker Project team set up a writing group to describe sources of pre-analytical variability that may influence the measurements of PINP and CTX-I. Data were collected through literature review on PINP and CTX-I conducted in PubMed, references of available publications, and inserts of diagnostic kits. Published data has been reviewed to provide a basis for recommendations for standardized sample handling, taking into account pre-analytical variability in order to decrease the variability for measurements of CTX and PINP so as to improve their reliability and interpretation. Several key aspects of patient and sample management must be considered and adhered to in order to control and limit the impact of pre-analytical variability. The controllable aspects include, e.g., time of blood collection, food intake, and season. The uncontrollable aspects include age, sex, pregnancy, immobility, recent fracture, co-morbidities (renal function, multiple myeloma, primary hyperparathyroidism, HIV infection), anti-osteoporotic drugs, and other medications (e.g., hormonal contraceptives, corticosteroids, aromatase inhibitors). The successful adoption of standardized sample handling and patient preparation recommendations necessitates the close collaboration of various stakeholders at the global stage, including the reagent manufacturers, the laboratories, the medical community, and the regulatory agencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 12 6%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Sports and Recreations 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 65 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,079,831
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,241
of 3,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,394
of 317,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#34
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.