You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Poplar stems show opposite epigenetic patterns during winter dormancy and vegetative growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trees, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00468-012-0800-x |
| Authors |
Daniel Conde, Pablo González-Melendi, Isabel Allona |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,075,458
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#217
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,682
of 181,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.