↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of non‐contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 2: A review of prevention programs aimed to modify risk factors and to reduce injury rates

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
937 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of non‐contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 2: A review of prevention programs aimed to modify risk factors and to reduce injury rates
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00167-009-0823-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduard Alentorn‐Geli, Gregory D. Myer, Holly J. Silvers, Gonzalo Samitier, Daniel Romero, Cristina Lázaro‐Haro, Ramón Cugat

Abstract

Soccer is the most commonly played sport in the world, with an estimated 265 million active soccer players participating in the game as on 2006. Inherent to this sport is the higher risk of injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) relative to other sports. ACL injury causes a significant loss of time from competition in soccer, which has served as the strong impetus to conduct research that focuses to determine the risk factors for injury, and more importantly, to identify and teach techniques to reduce this injury in the sport. This research emphasis has afforded a rapid influx of literature aimed to report the effects of neuromuscular training on the risk factors and the incidence of non-contact ACL injury in high-risk soccer populations. The purpose of the current review is to sequence the most recent literature relating the effects of prevention programs that were developed to alter risk factors associated with non-contact ACL injuries and to reduce the rate of non-contact ACL injuries in soccer players. To date there is no standardized intervention program established for soccer to prevent non-contact ACL injuries. Multi-component programs show better results than single-component preventive programs to reduce the risk and incidence of non-contact ACL injuries in soccer players. Lower extremity plyometrics, dynamic balance and strength, stretching, body awareness and decision-making, and targeted core and trunk control appear to be successful training components to reduce non-contact ACL injury risk factors (decrease landing forces, decrease varus/valgus moments, and increase effective muscle activation) and prevent non-contact ACL injuries in soccer players, especially in female athletes. Pre-season injury prevention combined with an in-season maintenance program may be advocated to prevent injury. Compliance may in fact be the limiting factor to the overall success of ACL injury interventions targeted to soccer players regardless of gender. Thus, interventional research must also consider techniques to improve compliance especially at the elite levels which will likely influence trickle down effects to sub-elite levels. Future research is also needed for male soccer athletes to help determine the most effective intervention to reduce the non-contact ACL injury risk factors and to prevent non-contact ACL injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 937 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Qatar 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 915 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 174 19%
Student > Bachelor 172 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 6%
Other 49 5%
Other 184 20%
Unknown 210 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 312 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 197 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 9%
Unspecified 20 2%
Engineering 20 2%
Other 58 6%
Unknown 242 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,748,206
of 25,128,618 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#280
of 2,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,859
of 119,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,128,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.