↓ Skip to main content

Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, January 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00037008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan H. Delucia, Thomas W. Sasek, Boyd R. Strain

Abstract

The effect of long-term exposure to elevated levels of CO2 on biomass partitioning, net photosynthesis and starch metabolism was examined in cotton. Plants were grown under controlled conditions at 350, 675 and 1000 μl l(-1) CO2. Plants grown at 675 and 1000 μl l(-1) had 72% and 115% more dry weight respectively than plants grown at 350 μl l(-1). Increases in weight were partially due to corresponding increases in leaf starch. CO2 enrichment also caused a decrease in chlorophyll concentration and a change in the chlorophyll a/b ratio. High CO2 grown plants had lower photosynthetic capacity than 350 μl l(-1) grown plants when measured at each CO2 concentration. Reduced photosynthetic rates were correlated with high internal (non-stomatal) resistances and higher starch levels. It is suggested that carbohydrate accumulation causes a decline in photosynthesis by feedback inhibition and/or physical damage at the chloroplast level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
China 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,909,930
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#125
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,371
of 40,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them