You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rectal carcinoids: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3430-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank D. McDermott, Anna Heeney, Danielle Courtney, Helen Mohan, Des Winter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 63% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#5,374,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#827
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,510
of 240,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#21
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.