You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EAU Policy on Live Surgery Events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Urology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter Artibani, Vincenzo Ficarra, Ben J. Challacombe, Clement-Claude Abbou, Jens Bedke, Rafael Boscolo-Berto, Maurizio Brausi, Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette, Serdar Deger, Louis Denis, Giorgio Guazzoni, Bertrand Guillonneau, John P.F.A. Heesakkers, Didier Jacqmin, Thomas Knoll, Luis Martínez-Piñeiro, Francesco Montorsi, Alexander Mottrie, Pierre-Thierry Piechaud, Abhay Rane, Jens Rassweiler, Arnulf Stenzl, Jeroen Van Moorselaar, Roland F. Van Velthoven, Hendrik van Poppel, Manfred Wirth, Per-Anders Abrahamsson, Keith F. Parsons |
| Abstract |
Live surgery is an important part of surgical education, with an increase in the number of live surgery events (LSEs) at meetings despite controversy about their real educational value, risks to patient safety, and conflicts of interest. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,236,753
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Urology
#750
of 6,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,646
of 322,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology
#9
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.