You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reply to Bos and De Jonge: Between-subject data do provide first empirical support for critical slowing down in depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1323835111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marieke Wichers, Denny Borsboom, Francis Tuerlinckx, Peter Kuppens, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Ingrid A. van de Leemput, Kenneth S. Kendler, Marten Scheffer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,067,759
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#99,419
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,575
of 229,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#966
of 1,002 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,002 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.