↓ Skip to main content

Dry-Coated Live Viral Vector Vaccines Delivered by Nanopatch Microprojections Retain Long-Term Thermostability and Induce Transgene-Specific T Cell Responses in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dry-Coated Live Viral Vector Vaccines Delivered by Nanopatch Microprojections Retain Long-Term Thermostability and Induce Transgene-Specific T Cell Responses in Mice
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances E. Pearson, Celia L. McNeilly, Michael L. Crichton, Clare A. Primiero, Sally R. Yukiko, Germain J. P. Fernando, Xianfeng Chen, Sarah C. Gilbert, Adrian V. S. Hill, Mark A. F. Kendall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Engineering 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,082,241
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,820
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,736
of 208,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#365
of 4,793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.