You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brief review: Supplementing oxygen through an airway exchange catheter: efficacy, complications, and recommendations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12630-011-9488-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura V. Duggan, J. Adam Law, Michael F. Murphy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 23% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
Librarian | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 35% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 68% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,874,583
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,096
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,646
of 120,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them