↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and Correlates of Problem Gambling in a Representative Sample of Norwegian 17-Year-Olds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and Correlates of Problem Gambling in a Representative Sample of Norwegian 17-Year-Olds
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10899-014-9455-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Hanss, Rune A. Mentzoni, Alex Blaszczynski, Helge Molde, Torbjørn Torsheim, Ståle Pallesen

Abstract

We report data collected in a representative sample of 17-year-old Norwegians to investigate prevalence rates of non-problem, risk, and problem gambling, as measured by the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI). In addition, we explored the importance of demographic, personality, motivational, social, and health variables explaining variance in adolescent gambling. Prevalence rates of risk and problem gambling were low but similar to those found in previous studies outside of Norway using the PGSI in adolescent samples. With regard to the relative importance of the various covariates, we found that motivational variables (future gambling intentions, attitudes toward gambling, and gambling-related knowledge) distinguished best between those who did not gamble, non-problem gamblers, and risk and problem gamblers. Furthermore, social variables were important covariates of adolescent gambling; significant associations were found for family and friends' approval of gambling, parental monitoring, father's level of education, and having relatives or friends with a history of a gambling disorder. We discuss possible reasons for differences between the covariates with regard to their importance for explaining adolescent gambling and address implications for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Unspecified 8 11%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Unspecified 8 11%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,041,169
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#324
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,487
of 237,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.