↓ Skip to main content

Stable associations between behavioral problems and language impairments across childhood – The importance of pragmatic language problems

Overview of attention for article published in Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable associations between behavioral problems and language impairments across childhood – The importance of pragmatic language problems
Published in
Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.02.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenche Andersen Helland, Astri J. Lundervold, Mikael Heimann, Maj-Britt Posserud

Abstract

This study investigated language function associated with behavior problems, focusing on pragmatics. Scores on the Children's Communication Checklist Second Edition (CCC-2) in a group of 40 adolescents (12-15 years) identified with externalizing behavior problems (BP) in childhood was compared to the CCC-2 scores in a typically developing comparison group (n=37). Behavioral, emotional and language problems were assessed by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and 4 language items, when the children in the BP group were 7-9 years (T1). They were then assessed with the SDQ and the CCC-2 when they were 12-15 years (T2). The BP group obtained poorer scores on 9/10 subscales on the CCC-2, and 70% showed language impairments in the clinical range. Language, emotional and peer problems at T1 were strongly correlated with pragmatic language impairments in adolescence. The findings indicate that assessment of language, especially pragmatics, is vital for follow-up and treatment of behavioral problems in children and adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 28%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Linguistics 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 54 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,928,462
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#1,239
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,571
of 235,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#25
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.