↓ Skip to main content

Understanding how and why the Gene Ontology and its annotations evolve: the GO within UniProt

Overview of attention for article published in Giga Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding how and why the Gene Ontology and its annotations evolve: the GO within UniProt
Published in
Giga Science, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-217x-3-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachael P Huntley, Tony Sawford, Maria J Martin, Claire O’Donovan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Hong Kong 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 127 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 24%
Computer Science 12 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,578,091
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#278
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,333
of 249,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.