↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Metformin on Left Ventricular Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Diabetes: The GIPS-III Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
95 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Metformin on Left Ventricular Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Diabetes: The GIPS-III Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.3315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris P. H. Lexis, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Erik Lipsic, Wouter G. Wieringa, Rudolf A. de Boer, Ad F. M. van den Heuvel, Hindrik W. van der Werf, Remco A. J. Schurer, Gabija Pundziute, Eng S. Tan, Wybe Nieuwland, Hendrik M. Willemsen, Bernard Dorhout, Barbara H. W. Molmans, Anouk N. A. van der Horst-Schrivers, Bruce H. R. Wolffenbuttel, Gert J. ter Horst, Albert C. van Rossum, Jan G. P. Tijssen, Hans L. Hillege, Bart J. G. L. de Smet, Pim van der Harst, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen

Abstract

Metformin treatment is associated with improved outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes. In animal experimental studies metformin preserves left ventricular function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 155 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Other 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Linguistics 2 1%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 32 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#523,649
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5,568
of 36,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,228
of 225,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#65
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.