↓ Skip to main content

Overview of available methods for diverse RNA-Seq data analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overview of available methods for diverse RNA-Seq data analyses
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11427-011-4255-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geng Chen, Charles Wang, TieLiu Shi

Abstract

RNA-Seq technology is becoming widely used in various transcriptomics studies; however, analyzing and interpreting the RNA-Seq data face serious challenges. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies, the sequencing cost is dropping dramatically with the sequencing output increasing sharply. However, the sequencing reads are still short in length and contain various sequencing errors. Moreover, the intricate transcriptome is always more complicated than we expect. These challenges proffer the urgent need of efficient bioinformatics algorithms to effectively handle the large amount of transcriptome sequencing data and carry out diverse related studies. This review summarizes a number of frequently-used applications of transcriptome sequencing and their related analyzing strategies, including short read mapping, exon-exon splice junction detection, gene or isoform expression quantification, differential expression analysis and transcriptome reconstruction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 369 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 28%
Researcher 95 23%
Student > Master 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 37 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 255 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 14%
Computer Science 20 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 3%
Mathematics 6 1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 45 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,939,118
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#252
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,608
of 242,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.