You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Prognostic Value of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-Defined Bleeding Complications in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction A Comparison With the TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction), GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries), and ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis) Bleeding Classifications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wouter J. Kikkert, Nan van Geloven, Mariet H. van der Laan, Marije M. Vis, Jan Baan, Karel T. Koch, Ron J. Peters, Robbert J. de Winter, Jan J. Piek, Jan G.P. Tijssen, José P.S. Henriques |
| Abstract |
The aim of the present analysis was to compare 1-year mortality prediction of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-defined bleeding complications with existing bleeding definitions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to investigate the prognostic value of the individual data elements of the bleeding classifications for 1-year mortality. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 54% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#9,855
of 16,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,487
of 236,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#133
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.