You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Psychosocial interventions for premature ejaculation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008195.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tamara Melnik, Stanley Althof, Álvaro N Atallah, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Puga, Sidney Glina, Rachel Riera |
Abstract |
Premature ejaculation (PE) is a very common sexual dysfunction among patients, and with varying prevalence estimates ranging from 3% to 20%. Although psychological issues are present in most patients with premature PE, as a cause or as a consequence, research on the effects of psychological approaches for PE has in general not been controlled or randomised and is lacking in long-term follow up. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Egypt | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 19% |
Unknown | 53 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 35% |
Psychology | 20 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 56 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,152,345
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,817
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,547
of 131,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.