↓ Skip to main content

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2583 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1587 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2010
DOI 10.1200/jco.2009.25.6529
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Daniel F. Hayes, Mitch Dowsett, D. Craig Allred, Karen L. Hagerty, Sunil Badve, Patrick L. Fitzgibbons, Glenn Francis, Neil S. Goldstein, Malcolm Hayes, David G. Hicks, Susan Lester, Richard Love, Pamela B. Mangu, Lisa McShane, Keith Miller, C. Kent Osborne, Soonmyung Paik, Jane Perlmutter, Anthony Rhodes, Hironobu Sasano, Jared N. Schwartz, Fred C.G. Sweep, Sheila Taube, Emina Emilia Torlakovic, Paul Valenstein, Giuseppe Viale, Daniel Visscher, Thomas Wheeler, R. Bruce Williams, James L. Wittliff, Antonio C. Wolff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Serbia 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Other 21 1%
Unknown 1540 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 225 14%
Researcher 193 12%
Student > Bachelor 168 11%
Student > Master 165 10%
Other 122 8%
Other 335 21%
Unknown 379 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 593 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 171 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 166 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 3%
Other 156 10%
Unknown 419 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#996,170
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,396
of 22,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,938
of 105,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#8
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.