↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study

Overview of attention for article published in npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study
Published in
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Persijn J Honkoop, Rik JB Loijmans, Evelien H Termeer, Jiska B Snoeck-Stroband, Gerben ter Riet, Tjard RJ Schermer, Jacob K Sont

Abstract

Online self-management programmes for asthma have recently become available. International guidelines suggest that the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) can be used in these programmes. In order to assess the current level of control and guide therapy, the same cut-off values are being used as in conventional asthma management. However, results might differ between different types of administration of the ACQ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Psychology 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 25%