↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, August 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

MP Carey, JT Goh, A Rosamilia, A Cornish, I Gordon, G Hawthorne, CF Maher, PL Dwyer, P Moran, DT Gilmour

Abstract

To compare perioperative characteristics, short-term, and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) and open Burch colposuspension (OBC) for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Other 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 57%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#5,816
of 6,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,246
of 91,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#33
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.