Framing love: When it hurts to think we were made for each other

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,023)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Framing love: When it hurts to think we were made for each other
Published in
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.007

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 9%
Australia 2 6%
Sweden 1 3%
China 1 3%
Philippines 1 3%
Unknown 25 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Researcher 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 70%
Business Administration 4 12%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Environmental Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%

Score in context

This research output has an Altmetric score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This score was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#35,504
of 4,725,876 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
#18
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,708
of 110,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,725,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 110,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them