↓ Skip to main content

Locomotor and diaphragm muscle fatigue in endurance athletes performing time-trials of different durations

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locomotor and diaphragm muscle fatigue in endurance athletes performing time-trials of different durations
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00421-014-2889-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas U. Wüthrich, Elisabeth C. Eberle, Christina M. Spengler

Abstract

Fatigue in leg muscles might differ between running and cycling due to inherent differences in muscle activation patterns. Moreover, postural demand placed upon the diaphragm during running could augment the development of diaphragm fatigue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 26 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,795,613
of 25,525,181 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,109
of 4,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,534
of 242,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,525,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.