↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors related to add-on dendritic cell vaccines on patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy: a multicenter analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic factors related to add-on dendritic cell vaccines on patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy: a multicenter analysis
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00262-014-1554-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masanori Kobayashi, Shigetaka Shimodaira, Kazuhiro Nagai, Masahiro Ogasawara, Hidenori Takahashi, Hirofumi Abe, Mitsugu Tanii, Masato Okamoto, Sun-ichi Tsujitani, Seiichi Yusa, Takefumi Ishidao, Junji Kishimoto, Yuta Shibamoto, Masaki Nagaya, Yoshikazu Yonemitsu, The DC Vaccine Study Group at the Japan Society of Innovative Cell Therapy (J-SICT)

Abstract

Dendritic cell (DC)-based cancer vaccines may have a significant benefit to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, variations among clinical studies make it difficult to compare clinical outcomes. Here, we identified factors that determined the clinical benefits by analyzing data obtained at seven Japanese institutions that employed the same DC preparation and treatment regimens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Other 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 13%
Psychology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,282,360
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#865
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,569
of 229,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.