↓ Skip to main content

Physical and Mental Health and Social Functioning in Older Alcohol-Dependent Inpatients: The Role of Age of Onset

Overview of attention for article published in European Addiction Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical and Mental Health and Social Functioning in Older Alcohol-Dependent Inpatients: The Role of Age of Onset
Published in
European Addiction Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1159/000357322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia F. van den Berg, Jolanda S.J. Hermes, Wim van den Brink, Peter Blanken, Nicolien Kist, Rob M. Kok

Abstract

Aims: Age of onset is an important criterion to distinguish subgroups of alcohol-dependent patients. This study investigated physical and mental health and social functioning of older inpatients with early (age <25), late (25-44), and very late (≥45) onset of alcohol dependence. Methods: In a specialized detoxification ward for older patients in The Hague, the Netherlands, 157 older alcohol-dependent inpatients (38% women, mean age 62.7 ± 6.5) were interviewed with the European version of the Addiction Severity Index. Results: As a group, older alcohol-dependent patients had substantial physical, mental and social problems, which were largely independent of the age of onset of alcohol dependence. Patients with early-onset alcohol dependence had more chronic medical problems and more suicidal thoughts than patients with late-onset alcohol dependence. The very-late-onset group did not significantly differ from the other two groups in any of the variables under study. Conclusions: Despite previous studies showing more favourable outcomes for the (very) late-onset compared to the early-onset alcohol-dependent group, their comorbid (mental) health and social problems are in many respects similar, and require careful assessment and treatment. This may be crucial for successful treatment and improving quality of life in these patients. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,822
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from European Addiction Research
#434
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,263
of 227,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Addiction Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.