↓ Skip to main content

Mother-to-Child Transmission of Chagas’ Disease in North America: Why Don’t We Do More?

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mother-to-Child Transmission of Chagas’ Disease in North America: Why Don’t We Do More?
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10995-007-0246-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Buekens, Olivia Almendares, Yves Carlier, Eric Dumonteil, Mark Eberhard, Rubi Gamboa-Leon, Mark James, Nicolas Padilla, Dawn Wesson, Xu Xiong

Abstract

Mothers with Chagas' disease can transmit Trypanosoma cruzi to their fetuses, who often become carriers of the infection and are then at risk of developing severe cardiac disease later in the course of their lives. If identified early enough after birth, the infected newborns can be treated and cured. Our objective was to review the data available in Canada, Mexico, and the United States and to discuss the need for prevention programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,823,538
of 24,746,716 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#652
of 2,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,443
of 73,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,746,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.