You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experiences of Professional Helping Relations by Persons with Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11469-017-9780-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Brekke, L. Lien, S. Biong |
| Abstract |
Recovery in co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders often involves relationships with professional helpers, yet little is known about how these are experienced by service users. The aim of this study was to explore and describe behaviour and attributes of professional helpers that support recovery, as experienced by persons with co-occurring disorders. Within a collaborative approach, in-depth individual interviews with eight persons with lived experience of co-occurring disorders were analysed using systematic text condensation. The analysis yielded four categories of recovery-supporting behaviour and attributes of professional helpers and the ability to build trust cuts across all of them: Building trust through (a) hopefulness and loving concern, (b) commitment, (c) direct honesty and expectation and (d) action and courage. Services should allow for flexibility and continuity, and training should recognise the importance of establishing trust in order to reach out to this group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Librarian | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#625
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,814
of 319,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.