You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0712-8 |
| Authors |
P. D. Meek, G. Ballard, A. Claridge, R. Kays, K. Moseby, T. O’Brien, A. O’Connell, J. Sanderson, D. E. Swann, M. Tobler, S. Townsend |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 918 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 894 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 203 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 16% |
| Researcher | 138 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 118 | 13% |
| Other | 46 | 5% |
| Other | 103 | 11% |
| Unknown | 166 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 397 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 257 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 1% |
| Engineering | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 4% |
| Unknown | 195 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,880,390
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#409
of 2,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,867
of 233,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.