You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive Value of Cervical Length Measurement and Fibronectin Testing in Threatened Preterm Labor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obstetrics & Gynecology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aog.0000000000000229 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gert-Jan van Baaren, Jolande Y. Vis, Femke F. Wilms, Martijn A. Oudijk, Anneke Kwee, Martina M. Porath, Guid Oei, Hubertina C. J. Scheepers, Marc E. A. Spaanderman, Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp, Monique C. Haak, Antoinette C. Bolte, Caroline J. Bax, Jérôme M. J. Cornette, Johannes J. Duvekot, Bas W. A. Nij Bijvanck, Jim van Eyck, Maureen T. M. Franssen, Krystyna M. Sollie, Frank P. H. A. Vandenbussche, Mallory Woiski, William A. Grobman, Joris A. M. van der Post, Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, Brent C. Opmeer, Ben W. J. Mol |
| Abstract |
To estimate the performance of combining cervical length measurement with fetal fibronectin testing in predicting delivery in women with symptoms of preterm labor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,180,216
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#2,863
of 8,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,731
of 240,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#30
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.