You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61197-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Halliday, Michael Harrison, Elizabeth Hayter, Xiangling Kong, Averil Mansfield, Joanna Marro, Hongchao Pan, Richard Peto, John Potter, Kazem Rahimi, Angela Rau, Steven Robertson, Jonathan Streifler, Dafydd Thomas, on behalf of the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group |
| Abstract |
If carotid artery narrowing remains asymptomatic (ie, has caused no recent stroke or other neurological symptoms), successful carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces stroke incidence for some years. We assessed the long-term effects of successful CEA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 523 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 508 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 16% |
| Other | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 153 | 29% |
| Unknown | 89 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 316 | 60% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 8% |
| Unknown | 110 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#980,761
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7,620
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,784
of 108,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#31
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.