↓ Skip to main content

The effect of lateral wedge insoles in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: balancing biomechanics with pain neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of lateral wedge insoles in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: balancing biomechanics with pain neuroscience
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10067-014-2668-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabel A. C. Baert, Jo Nijs, Mira Meeus, Enrique Lluch, Filip Struyf

Abstract

Results on the effects of lateral wedge insoles (LWIs) in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) are ambiguous and not fully understood. Because of the low cost of this intervention and its clinical utility, attention to LWIs is worth considering. Current insights on the efficacy of LWIs are mainly focused on changing biomechanical aspects, such as the external knee adduction moment, in an attempt to influence pain, functional ability and structural progression. It is however appropriate to interpret the effectiveness of LWIs in a broader concept than the pure biomechanical approach. Given our current understanding of OA-related pain, including the involvement of the central nervous system and nociception-motor interactions, concepts of pain neuroscience should be taken into account. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the biomechanical effect of LWIs. It aims to discuss the degree to which such biomechanical effect translates to clinical effects (symptom relief, function recovery and reduction of structural progression). In order to explain these clinical effects, this paper balances biomechanics with pain neuroscience. A literature search was performed and reviewed using a narrative approach. Many studies investigated the effect of LWIs on dynamic knee joint loading, and beneficial biomechanical effects (reduction in knee adduction moment) were observed in patients with mild to moderate medial knee OA, in particular when using full-length LWIs. However, despite beneficial biomechanical effects, there is insufficient evidence for clinically important effects or significant reductions in disease progression. Evaluating the effects of LWIs, our current understanding of OA pain should be taken into account, as LWIs may be part of a comprehensive biopsychosocial treatment. Future work on all of the variables that could influence clinical outcomes in order to decide in which subgroups of patients LWIs are (most) effective is necessary.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Engineering 8 9%
Unspecified 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,309
of 2,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,045
of 226,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#48
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.