↓ Skip to main content

Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes

Overview of attention for article published in Knowledge In Society, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 558)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
47 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
414 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes
Published in
Knowledge In Society, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x
Authors

Bruno Lepri, Nuria Oliver, Emmanuel Letouzé, Alex Pentland, Patrick Vinck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 417 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 17%
Student > Master 61 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Researcher 39 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 133 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 77 18%
Social Sciences 52 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 46 11%
Engineering 20 5%
Arts and Humanities 14 3%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 144 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#737,214
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Knowledge In Society
#39
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,040
of 327,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knowledge In Society
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.