Title |
Neurocognitive mechanisms of perception–action coordination: A review and theoretical integration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K. Richard Ridderinkhof |
Abstract |
The present analysis aims at a theoretical integration of, and a systems-neuroscience perspective on, a variety of historical and contemporary views on perception-action coordination (PAC). We set out to determine the common principles or lawful linkages between sensory and motor systems that explain how perception is action-oriented and how action is perceptually guided. To this end, we analyze the key ingredients to such an integrated framework, examine the architecture of dual-system conjectures of PAC, and endeavor in an historical analysis of the key characteristics, mechanisms, and phenomena of PACs. This analysis will reveal that dual-systems views are in need of fundamental re-thinking, and its elements will be amalgamated with current views on action-oriented predictive processing into a novel integrative theoretical framework (IMPPACT: Impetus, Motivation, and Prediction in Perception-Action Coordination theory). From this framework and its neurocognitive architecture we derive a number of non-trivial predictions regarding conative, motive-driven PAC. We end by presenting a brief outlook on how IMPPACT might present novel insights into certain pathologies and into action expertise. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Austria | 1 | 20% |
Ireland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 208 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 26% |
Researcher | 37 | 17% |
Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 84 | 39% |
Neuroscience | 28 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 38 | 18% |
Unknown | 43 | 20% |