↓ Skip to main content

Infant Feeding Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Predict Antenatal Intention Among First-Time Mothers in Queensland

Overview of attention for article published in Breastfeeding Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infant Feeding Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Predict Antenatal Intention Among First-Time Mothers in Queensland
Published in
Breastfeeding Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1089/bfm.2014.0012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Newby, Wendy Brodribb, Robert S. Ware, Peter S.W. Davies

Abstract

Abstract Aim: This study assessed infant feeding knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among women from Queensland, Australia, in their first pregnancy. Antenatal feeding intention in this group was described, and the hypothesis was tested that antenatal knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about infant feeding are associated with antenatal intention for the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding for the infant's first year. Subjects and Methods: The Feeding Queensland Babies Study is a prospective survey of infant feeding attitudes and behaviors among first-time mothers in Queensland, Australia. Data on infant feeding knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intention were collected antenatally, and an Infant Feeding Attitudes Score was calculated. Results: Although 85% of respondents endorsed breastfeeding as most appropriate for infants, 11% valued formula feeding equally. Intention to give any breastmilk during the first weeks was 98%, but it fell to 18% during the second year. More than one-quarter of women reported intention to introduce foods other than breastmilk before 5 months of infant age. The infant feeding attitudes and beliefs score correlated positively with feeding intention for breastfeeding and the introduction of complementary solids. Conclusions: Enhancing women's knowledge of recommendations and their understanding of breastfeeding's specific benefits and the reasons for recommended scheduling of feeding transitions may positively impact breastfeeding exclusivity and duration and the age-appropriate introduction of complementary solids. Communication of detailed feeding recommendations for the infant's first year and specific information about the health benefits of breastfeeding should be a goal of healthcare providers working with pregnant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Psychology 7 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,752,998
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Breastfeeding Medicine
#1,018
of 1,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,264
of 241,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breastfeeding Medicine
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.