You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PASSCLAIM1—Gut health and immunity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-004-1205-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John H. Cummings, Jean-Michel Antoine, Fernando Azpiroz, Raphaelle Bourdet-Sicard, Per Brandtzaeg, Philip C. Calder, Glenn R. Gibson, Francisco Guarner, Erika Isolauri, Daphne Pannemans, Colette Shortt, Sandra Tuijtelaars, Bernhard Watzl |
| Abstract |
The gut and immune system form a complex integrated structure that has evolved to provide effective digestion and defence against ingested toxins and pathogenic bacteria. However, great variation exists in what is considered normal healthy gut and immune function. Thus, whilst it is possible to measure many aspects of digestion and immunity, it is more difficult to interpret the benefits to individuals of variation within what is considered to be a normal range. Nevertheless, it is important to set standards for optimal function for use both by the consumer, industry and those concerned with the public health. The digestive tract is most frequently the object of functional and health claims and a large market already exists for gut-functional foods worldwide. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 344 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 15% |
| Researcher | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 72 | 21% |
| Unknown | 72 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 18% |
| Unknown | 82 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,804,243
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#938
of 2,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,504
of 58,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.