↓ Skip to main content

Magic wands of CRISPR—lots of choices for gene knock-in

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biology and Toxicology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magic wands of CRISPR—lots of choices for gene knock-in
Published in
Cell Biology and Toxicology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10565-017-9409-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsushi Sakuma, Takashi Yamamoto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Chemical Engineering 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,952,935
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#257
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,103
of 317,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.