↓ Skip to main content

Separating Xylene Isomers by Commensurate Stacking of p‐Xylene within Channels of MAF‐X8

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Separating Xylene Isomers by Commensurate Stacking of p‐Xylene within Channels of MAF‐X8
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/anie.201402894
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariana Torres‐Knoop, Rajamani Krishna, David Dubbeldam

Abstract

The development of energy-efficient processes for selective separation of p-xylene from mixtures with its isomers is of vital importance in the petrochemical industries. Current industrial practice uses BaX zeolite that has high adsorption selectivity for p-xylene. Finding para-selective structures is challenging. With state-of-the-art simulation methodologies we systematically screened a wide variety of zeolites and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Our investigations highlight the crucial importance of the channel dimension on the separation. MAF-X8 is particularly noteworthy because the channel dimensions and geometry allow "commensurate stacking" which we exploit as a separation mechanism at saturation conditions. Due to a significantly improved capacity compared to BaX, the cycle times for p-xylene with MAF-X8 are found to be about a factor of 4.5 longer. This is expected to result in significant process improvements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 27%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 19 37%
Engineering 7 13%
Chemical Engineering 6 12%
Materials Science 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,055,117
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#21,167
of 50,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,246
of 244,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#309
of 734 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 734 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.