↓ Skip to main content

The Adsorption and Simulated Separation of Light Hydrocarbons in Isoreticular Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on Dendritic Ligands with Different Aliphatic Side Chains

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Adsorption and Simulated Separation of Light Hydrocarbons in Isoreticular Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on Dendritic Ligands with Different Aliphatic Side Chains
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/chem.201304962
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiangtao Jia, Lei Wang, Fuxing Sun, Xiaofei Jing, Zheng Bian, Lianxun Gao, Rajamani Krishna, Guangshan Zhu

Abstract

Three isoreticular metal-organic frameworks, JUC-100, JUC-103 and JUC-106, were synthesized by connecting six-node dendritic ligands to a [Zn4O(CO2)6] cluster. JUC-103 and JUC-106 have additional methyl and ethyl groups, respectively, in the pores with respect to JUC-100. The uptake measurements of the three MOFs for CH4, C2H4, C2H6 and C3H8 were carried out. At 298 K, 1 atm, JUC-103 has relatively high CH4 uptake, but JUC-100 is the best at 273 K, 1 atm. JUC-100 and JUC-103 have similar C2H4 absorption ability. In addition, JUC-100 has the best absorption capacity for C2H6 and C3H8. These results suggest that high surface area and appropriate pore size are important factors for gas uptake. Furthermore, ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) analyses show that all three MOFs have good C3H8/CH4 and C2H6/CH4 selectivities for an equimolar quaternary CH4/C2H4/C2H6/C3H8 gas mixture maintained at isothermal conditions at 298 K, and JUC-106 has the best C2H6/CH4 selectivity. The breakthrough simulations indicate that all three MOFs have good capability for separating C2 hydrocarbons from C3 hydrocarbons. The pulse chromatographic simulations also indicate that all three MOFs are able to separate CH4/C2 H4/C2H6/C3H8 mixture into three different fractions of C1, C2 and C3 hydrocarbons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 25%
Chemical Engineering 3 19%
Engineering 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,074,210
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#18,765
of 22,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,828
of 233,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#157
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.