↓ Skip to main content

Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in General Practice to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes among 18 to 60-Year-Old South Asians: 1-Year Effects on the Weight Status and Metabolic Profile of Participants in a…

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in General Practice to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes among 18 to 60-Year-Old South Asians: 1-Year Effects on the Weight Status and Metabolic Profile of Participants in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wanda M. Admiraal, Everlina M. Vlaar, Vera Nierkens, Frits Holleman, Barend J. C. Middelkoop, Karien Stronks, Irene G. M. van Valkengoed

Abstract

To study 1-year effectiveness of an intensive, culturally targeted lifestyle intervention in general practice for weight status and metabolic profile of South-Asians at risk of type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Lecturer 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Sports and Recreations 11 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 47 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,692,589
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,090
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,453
of 211,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,005
of 4,812 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,812 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.