↓ Skip to main content

Single-cell analysis of the transcriptome and its application in the characterization of stem cells and early embryos

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single-cell analysis of the transcriptome and its application in the characterization of stem cells and early embryos
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00018-014-1601-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Na Liu, Lin Liu, Xinghua Pan

Abstract

Cellular heterogeneity within a cell population is a common phenomenon in multicellular organisms, tissues, cultured cells, and even FACS-sorted subpopulations. Important information may be masked if the cells are studied as a mass. Transcriptome profiling is a parameter that has been intensively studied, and relatively easier to address than protein composition. To understand the basis and importance of heterogeneity and stochastic aspects of the cell function and its mechanisms, it is essential to examine transcriptomes of a panel of single cells. High-throughput technologies, starting from microarrays and now RNA-seq, provide a full view of the expression of transcriptomes but are limited by the amount of RNA for analysis. Recently, several new approaches for amplification and sequencing the transcriptome of single cells or a limited low number of cells have been developed and applied. In this review, we summarize these major strategies, such as PCR-based methods, IVT-based methods, phi29-DNA polymerase-based methods, and several other methods, including their principles, characteristics, advantages, and limitations, with representative applications in cancer stem cells, early development, and embryonic stem cells. The prospects for development of future technology and application of transcriptome analysis in a single cell are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#3,458
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,091
of 224,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#57
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.