↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200826050-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mendel E. Singer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,669
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,971
of 189,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#521
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.