↓ Skip to main content

Physiological Basis and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Coronary Stenoses of Intermediate Severity

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
321 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological Basis and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Coronary Stenoses of Intermediate Severity
Published in
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, April 2014
DOI 10.1161/circinterventions.113.001049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim P van de Hoef, Martijn A van Lavieren, Peter Damman, Ronak Delewi, Martijn A Piek, Steven A J Chamuleau, Michiel Voskuil, José P S Henriques, Karel T Koch, Robbert J de Winter, Jos A E Spaan, Maria Siebes, Jan G P Tijssen, Martijn Meuwissen, Jan J Piek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Other 21 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 55%
Engineering 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 54 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,450,412
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#520
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,980
of 242,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.